the chick flick guy: a real man with a reel weakness
  • Home
  • Find a Movie
    • A-C
    • D-G
    • H-M
    • N-S
    • T-Z, Numerals
  • Contact the guy

"One for the Money" ✰✰ Doesn't add up past the "One"

02/10/2012

0 Comments

 
"One for the Money," (2012) which is based on the first of Janet Evanovich's successful series of Stephanie Plum novels,  seems clearly to have been made with the thought that it would spawn an equally popular series of films. Off the top of my head, I'm guessing the movie maker calculus equation involved a lot of dependable constants like these:
  • Plucky heroine played by bankable star, looking for a series that would keep her busy for years
  • Fish-out-of-water female character in a man's world
  • Girl with a gun, always good for laughs
  • Just enough bare skin, just enough violence
  • Tantalizing antagonists who are also in love (as in Heigl's "Life As We Know It" and ""27 Dresses")
  • Built in audience of Evanovich fans
The problem is that some of the variables -- the unknowns in the equation -- turned out to be zero. Even a million winds up nothing when you multiply it times zero.

In the film, Katherine Heigl plays Stephanie Plum. Out of work and out of money, Plum somehow goes from lingerie saleswoman (so we are told, not shown) to bail recovery agent -- a bounty hunter. The Plum job, so to speak, is to bring in her one-time boyfriend, a cop on the run because he's suspected of murder. 

I like Heigl, but what I've found charming in other films rarely appears here. She comes off more tarty than sultry, more game for a challange than capable. Part of that is the fault of the writing that leans on stereotypes of bounty hunters, prostitutes, boxing promoters and more. I haven't read the Evanovich books, so some of it may trace back to that. I don't want to knock detective fiction.  I just don't read it because (having read a few Rex Stout mysteries) I know I'd just get addicted, the same way I'm hung up on romantic comedies. But there isn't a lot of danger of me becoming a slave to Stephanie Plum films.

I wanted to like this movie, but it just didn't have the hook I expect from a bang-bang love story. They're supposed to keep you on the edge of your seat wondering whether the next bullet or Cupid's arrow will hit the leads. Even the frenetically violent Bond movie "Quantum of Solace" and the laughable "Knight and Day" include enough nuance, humanity and plain animal magnetism to make those films more charming that this one.

"One for the Money" -- one movie made just for the money -- seems likely to be the only one. I would deem it unripe pickings for a sequel of "Two for the Dough," Evanovich's second Plum novel. But I won't bet on the franchise withering on the tree. After all, there have been at least three sequels to "Attack of the Killer Tomatoes."
Add Comment
 

    The Chick Flick Guy

    Chick Flick Guy says no thanks to Shoot, Crash and Explode Cinema. (Except "Speed.") He's the man sitting alone in theaters where the audience is mostly couples and Girls Night Out groups. This website is where you can find categorized lists of favorite romantic comedies and the occasional weeper, brief reviews and polls asking you what you think about  films and stars, popular and indie. 

    Follow chickflickguy on Twitter

    Categories

    All
    Classics
    Favorites
    Guest Bloggers
    Lists
    Other Movie Blogs
    Previews
    Reader Questions
    Review
    Reviews
    The Guyifesto
    Trivia Questions

    The Banner

    The "Chick Flick Guy" image is made from letters in movie titles. For more on that, click here.

    RSS Feed

    About the guy

    Carlos Alcalá is a middle-aged man with the movie tastes of a
    13-year-old girl. Fortunately, he is also a writer with strong analytical skills and decades of experience. He is married to a woman who has far better taste in cinema and he has three children, including a daughter who finds her father's love of chick flicks embarrassing. 

    Picture

    What the stars mean

    ✰ 
    So bad that it offends. I need to wash my eyes now.
    ✰✰ 
    Can't recommend it, but it has some redeeming qualities.
    ✰✰✰ 
    Average, but I really enjoyed it. I'm like that.
    ✰✰✰✰ 
    Love it. It has flaws, but they're endearing.
    ✰✰✰✰✰ 
    So good, I don't know what to say. Can we watch it again now?

    Archives

    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011


Create a free website with Weebly